0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.41	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.15/0.41	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.41	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.41	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.41	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.41	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.41	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.41	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:00:28 UTC 2026
0.15/0.42	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.42	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.22/0.48	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.22/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wZAsCMGazF/E---3.1_742221.p
0.22/0.52	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.22/0.52	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.22/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.52	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 180s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% sh2lt with pid 742234 completed with status 0
0.22/0.52	% Result found by sh2lt
0.22/0.52	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.22/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.52	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.22/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.22/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.22/0.52	% Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
0.22/0.52	% partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.22/0.52	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
0.22/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% SubtermCWHack with pid 742239 completed with status 0
0.22/0.52	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.22/0.52	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.22/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.22/0.52	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.22/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.22/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.22/0.52	% Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
0.22/0.52	% partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.22/0.52	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
0.22/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	% Proof found!
0.22/0.52	% SZS status Theorem
0.22/0.52	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_1: ((($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o) > ($o > $o) > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_1: ((($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o) > $o > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_25, type, epred3_0: (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(choiceoo, conjecture, ?[X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:(![X2:($o > $o) > $o]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X2))<=?[X3:$o > $o]:((X2 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wZAsCMGazF/E---3.1_742221.p', choiceoo)).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:(![X2:($o > $o) > $o]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X2))<=?[X3:$o > $o]:((X2 @ X3)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[choiceoo])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:(![X2:($o > $o) > $o]:((?[X3:$o > $o]:((X2 @ X3))=>(X2 @ (X1 @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X7:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:(((epred1_1 @ X7 @ (epred2_1 @ X7))&~(epred1_1 @ X7 @ (X7 @ (epred1_1 @ X7))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:(~((epred1_1 @ X1 @ (X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X10:($o > $o) > $o, X11:$o > $o]:(((X10 @ (epred3_0 @ X10))|~((X10 @ X11)))), inference(introduce_choice_axiom,[status(thm)],[])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:(((epred1_1 @ X1 @ (epred3_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))|~((epred1_1 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:((epred1_1 @ X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:((epred1_1 @ X1 @ (epred3_0 @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_8]), ['proof']).
0.22/0.52	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.22/0.52	% Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.22/0.52	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.22/0.52	% Initial clauses                      : 2
0.22/0.52	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.22/0.52	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.22/0.52	% Processed clauses                    : 4
0.22/0.52	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.22/0.52	% ...subsumed                          : 0
0.22/0.52	% ...remaining for further processing  : 4
0.22/0.52	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.22/0.52	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.22/0.52	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.22/0.52	% Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.22/0.52	% Generated clauses                    : 4
0.22/0.52	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
0.22/0.52	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.22/0.52	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.22/0.52	% Paramodulations                      : 2
0.22/0.52	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.22/0.52	% NegExts                              : 0
0.22/0.52	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.22/0.52	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.22/0.52	% Total rewrite steps                  : 1
0.22/0.52	% ...of those cached                   : 0
0.22/0.52	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.22/0.52	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.22/0.52	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.22/0.52	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.22/0.52	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.22/0.52	% Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.22/0.52	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.22/0.52	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.22/0.52	%    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.22/0.52	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.22/0.52	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
0.22/0.52	% ...number of literals in the above   : 2
0.22/0.52	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.22/0.52	% Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.22/0.52	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.22/0.52	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.22/0.52	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.22/0.52	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.22/0.52	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.22/0.52	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.22/0.52	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.22/0.52	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.22/0.52	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.22/0.52	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 315
0.22/0.52	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 54
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.52	% User time                : 0.003 s
0.22/0.52	% System time              : 0.002 s
0.22/0.52	% Total time               : 0.005 s
0.22/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.52	% User time                : 0.011 s
0.22/0.52	% System time              : 0.008 s
0.22/0.52	% Total time               : 0.020 s
0.22/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.22/0.52	% E exiting
0.22/0.52	EOF